<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FaceBook Marketing Experiment 1: Social Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jimlillig.com/internet-marketing/facebook-marketing-experiment-1-social-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jimlillig.com/internet-marketing/facebook-marketing-experiment-1-social-ads/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:23:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew wee</title>
		<link>http://www.jimlillig.com/internet-marketing/facebook-marketing-experiment-1-social-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew wee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 03:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimlillig.com/internet-marketing/facebook-marketing-experiment-1-social-ads/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>Jim,

In my opinion, folks on video and social networks (youtube, revver, friendster, myspace, facebook)

are early in the buying cycle. So there&#039;re likely to look for more &quot;informational&quot; rather than &quot;transactional&quot; sites.



Hence, your facebook flyers, er, now called Facebook Ads, will probably get higher approval rates (and possibly conversions) if they&#039;re positioned to be &quot;informational&quot; in nature.



Couple that with seductive copywriting or content, and you should see the conversions come in.



I know that bikini-clad women get more clicks, but it may not always be the type of traffic that buys.



I did a post on the buying cycle at:

http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/payperclick-ppc/google-adwords-holiday-profit-tips/



Also, males aged 18-65 looks like a wide range.



I think 18-30 works well for a social site,

and 30-50 might convert well for a paid service.



It&#039;s a matter of matching psychographics/demographics to the necessary action on the backend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim,</p>
<p>In my opinion, folks on video and social networks (youtube, revver, friendster, myspace, facebook)</p>
<p>are early in the buying cycle. So there&#8217;re likely to look for more &#8220;informational&#8221; rather than &#8220;transactional&#8221; sites.</p>
<p>Hence, your facebook flyers, er, now called Facebook Ads, will probably get higher approval rates (and possibly conversions) if they&#8217;re positioned to be &#8220;informational&#8221; in nature.</p>
<p>Couple that with seductive copywriting or content, and you should see the conversions come in.</p>
<p>I know that bikini-clad women get more clicks, but it may not always be the type of traffic that buys.</p>
<p>I did a post on the buying cycle at:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/payperclick-ppc/google-adwords-holiday-profit-tips/" rel="nofollow">http://www.whoisandrewwee.com/payperclick-ppc/google-adwords-holiday-profit-tips/</a></p>
<p>Also, males aged 18-65 looks like a wide range.</p>
<p>I think 18-30 works well for a social site,</p>
<p>and 30-50 might convert well for a paid service.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a matter of matching psychographics/demographics to the necessary action on the backend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Iser</title>
		<link>http://www.jimlillig.com/internet-marketing/facebook-marketing-experiment-1-social-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Iser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 04:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jimlillig.com/internet-marketing/facebook-marketing-experiment-1-social-ads/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Hey Jim,



Facebook&#039;s facing some scruntiny right now because the advertising isn&#039;t meeting up to standards for advertisers.



One thing for sure is that they&#039;re still trying to improve on their model.



But who knows, I&#039;ve seen some pretty incredible things happening so far.



Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jim,</p>
<p>Facebook&#8217;s facing some scruntiny right now because the advertising isn&#8217;t meeting up to standards for advertisers.</p>
<p>One thing for sure is that they&#8217;re still trying to improve on their model.</p>
<p>But who knows, I&#8217;ve seen some pretty incredible things happening so far.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

